EVALUATING FRAUD CONCEPT IN AUDIT PROFESSION PAST & PRESENT

Munshi Samaduzzaman, Farah Rezwan, Kashfia Sharmeen

Abstract


As the classic fraud triangle theory developed over the years, New Standards such as SAS99, SAS104, and SAS111 came into action in USA and ASA 240 in Australia. The new standards provide explanatory guidance on the auditor’s responsibility to consider fraud in an audit of a financial report. The new standards require the audit team to always maintain an attitude of professional skepticism, recognizing the possibility that a material misstatement due to fraud could exist. The standards are now implemented as legislations under corporation’s law and are legally enforceable on auditors. Auditing standards have been developed all these years in response to uncovered frauds and today auditors are held more accountable and responsible for their job. Expectations from auditors have also increased but it is still difficult to completely prevent the possibility of any future collapse.


References


American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) 2002, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. New York, NY: AICPA.

ASA240. AUASB WEBSITE – Online. Retrieved from

http://www.auasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/ASA_240_28-04-06.pdf

Auditing Standard ASA240 2011, The Auditor's Responsibility to Consider Fraud in an Audit of a Financial Report, Commonwealth of Australia, Melbourne. Retrieved from

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011C00631

Blanque, P. (2003) "Crisis and fraud", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 11 Iss: 1, pp.60 – 70. (Online emerald).

David T. Wolfe and Dana R. Hermanson (2004) – ‘The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud’. CPA Online Journal. Retrieved from

http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2004/1204/essentials/p38.htm

Explanatory Statement for ASA 240 – Online. Retrieved from

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrument1.nsf/0/B18E803B67DD1DC9CA2571690001CC5A/$file/ASA_240_-_Explanatory_Statement.pdf

IFAC website Online. Retrieved from http://www.ifac.org/About/

Loft, A 2005, In pursuit of global regulation changing governance and accountability structures at the International Federation of Accountants(IFAC), University of Manchester. (Online: Emerald).

Noblet, I, Jessup, CM. 2012. 2012Fraud Insights Derived from Stories of Auditors of Financial Institutions. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting. Vol. 4, Issue 2.

Peterson, BK 2004, Education as a new Approach to fighting financial crime in the USA, Journal of financial crime, Vol 11, No 3,pp-262-267, Henry Stewart Publications. (Online emerald).

SAS104 to SAS111. AICPA Website Online. Retrieved from

http://www.aicpa.org/download/members/div/auditstd/riasai/RAS_Summary_for_Website.pdf

The Fraud Triangle Diagram. The CPA Journal Online. Retrieved from

http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2006/106/images/ex2p61.pdf

Thomas A. Ratcliffe (2000) – ‘Understanding SAS No. 89 audit adjustments’. CPA Online Journal. Retrieved from

http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2000/0400/Features/f43400a.htm


پاراگلایدر Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

ISSN : 2251-1555