میز اداری صندلی مدیریتی تبلیغات کلیکی پاراگلایدر لباس زیر شورت زنانه خرید اینترنتی وبلاگدهی گن لاغری عکس بازیگران عکس بازیگران

A Research Paper on Purchasing Behavior of Rural and Urban College Going Students over Apparels, Prakasam District, A.P.

Dr. P. SUBBAIAH

Abstract


Consumer behavior is all about psychological, social and physical behavior of potential customers namely individuals, groups, or organizations and the processes they use to select, secure, and dispose of products, services, experiences, or ideas to satisfy needs and the impacts that these processes have on the consumer and society. Buyer’s reactions to a firms marketing strategy has a great impact on the firm’s success. Thus, now a day understanding the consumer buying behavior has become vital to producers/marketers. The study highlights the major socio-economic differences between rural and urban college going students in terms of their purchasing habits, brand awareness and the student’s preference of brands, paying capacity, patterns of shopping and overall purchasing behavior of the college going students. It is also indispensable to marketers/ designers to know what kind of apparels that the respondents like more, where do they buy and what type they buy and in what quantity they buy, to design and redesign their business strategies to cope up with competition in the market. The conceptualization is then tested with primary quantitative survey data collected from students studying in different colleges of Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh. Correlation, Chi-square tests and percentages are used in the study.

Key words: Apparels, Brand awareness, Business strategy, Consumer behavior, Socio economic differences.


References


Bian Y, Breiger R, Davis D, Galaskiewicz J (2005). Occupation, Class, and Social Networks in Urban China. Soc. Forces 83(4):1443-1468.

Howard JA, Sheth JN (1969). A Theory of Buying Behavior. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Rich SU, Jain SC (1968). Social Class and Life Cycle as predictors of shopping behavior. J. Market. Res. 5(1): pp 41-49.

Stuber JM (2009). Class, Culture, and Participation in the Collegiate Extra-Curriculum. Social Forum 24(4).

Hamilton K (2009). Consumer decision making in low-income families: The case of conflict avoidance. J. Consumer Behavior. 8:252-267

Ebenkam B (2005). Style: it's a Natural Fact. Brand week 22.

Joseph W.Newmann and Richard Stealin, (1972),”Pre-purchase Information Seeking for New Cars and Motor Household Appliances. “Journal of Marketing Research, August, Vol.IX, pp.249-257.

Leo Bogart and Charles Lehman. (1973), “What Makes a Brand Name Familiar”, Journal of Marketing, January. Vol.X; pp.17-22.

Burger, c & Herbst, F. 2002. Research Paper. University of Pretoria.

Engel James F & Roger D.Blackwell, (1982), “Consumer Behavior”, Hinsdale, Dryden press.

Francesco M Nicosia, (1966), “Consumer Decision Process: Marketing and Advertising Implementations”, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, Prentice Hall Inc.

Fred D.Reynolds and William D.Wells, (1977), “Consumer Behavior”, McGraw Hill, New York.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

ISSN : 2251-1547